Here's some recent IELTS writing questions and sample answers.
Recent IELTS Writing Questions:
Some people think that the government should continue to fund the arts, such as music and theatre, while others think it should spend more money on practical things such as health and education. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recent IELTS Writing Questions and Sample Answers:
The question of how public funds should be allocated is a contentious one, with people holding strongly to either side. On one hand, there are those who believe that the government should continue to fund the arts, such as music and theatre, while on the other, those who would prefer more money to be spent on practical things such as health and education.
Proponents of the arts argue that they are an intrinsic part of a society’s culture and identity, and that they should be supported and preserved. Music, theatre and other art forms have a powerful influence over our lives, and provide a form of entertainment and relaxation for many people. They also offer an outlet for creativity, and can be used as a powerful tool for communication and education.
On the other hand, it is understandable that those who prefer more money to be spent on practical things such as health and education, feel that the government’s budget should be allocated to areas that have a tangible benefit to society. Education and health are essential for a well-functioning society, and providing adequate funding for these areas is essential.
In my opinion, I believe that both the arts and practical things such as health and education should be funded by the government. The arts provide a valuable contribution to our society, and should be supported to ensure that they are preserved and celebrated. At the same time, the government should also allocate sufficient funds to areas such as health and education, which are essential for a well-functioning society.
Recent IELTS Writing Questions: Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In my opinion, I partially agree that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. On the one hand, there are many benefits that such a system could bring, such as helping to create more socially responsible citizens and giving students the chance to develop teamwork and problem-solving skills. On the other hand, this could be too much of a burden for students, who already have a demanding academic workload.
I believe that it is important to teach young people the value of giving back to their communities, so I do think that some kind of community service should be part of the high school curriculum.
However, I believe that this should be done in a way that is voluntary, so that those students who are interested can take part without feeling pressure from their peers or from their teachers. This way, students can choose activities that they are passionate about, and be more engaged with the project. It should also be noted that schools should provide appropriate training and supervision for any such activities, to ensure that students are safe and that they are providing a meaningful contribution to their community.
In conclusion, while I think that it is important to teach young people the value of community service, it should be voluntary and not a compulsory part of high school programmes. This way, students can gain valuable skills and experiences while still having the freedom to choose activities that they are passionate about.
Recent IELTS Writing Questions :
Some people say that the government should pay university fees for all students. Do you agree or disagree?"
The debate surrounding whether or not the government should pay university fees for all students is a contentious issue that has been discussed in various settings. Supporters of this idea argue that higher education is a public good that benefits society as a whole. They contend that investing in education can lead to increased economic growth and innovation by increasing the number of highly skilled workers in the workforce. Moreover, they argue that removing the financial burden of tuition fees can provide equal access to higher education, especially for students from low-income families, which can help reduce social inequality.
However, opponents of this idea argue that it is too expensive and can lead to a decrease in the quality of education. They contend that the government would need to divert significant amounts of money from other important areas such as healthcare and infrastructure to cover the costs of tuition fees. Additionally, if universities were fully funded by the government, they might not have an incentive to maintain high standards of education, and the quality of education could decrease.
While both sides of the argument have valid points, I tend to agree with the idea of the government paying university fees for all students. This is because education is a crucial aspect of development that cannot be overlooked. With the increasing demand for highly skilled workers, investing in education is an excellent way to ensure that the workforce is equipped to handle the challenges of the future. Moreover, education is a right that should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic background.
The government can fund university fees in several ways. They can impose higher taxes on the wealthy, introduce a student loan scheme, or a combination of both. Furthermore, the government can work in collaboration with universities to ensure that the quality of education is not compromised. This can be achieved by setting standards and monitoring the progress of universities to ensure they adhere to the set standards.
In conclusion, the government paying university fees for all students is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. However, providing access to higher education for everyone is a necessary investment in the future. With careful planning and collaboration, the government can fund university fees while maintaining high standards of education.
Recent IELTS Writing Questions:
Some people say that the internet and mobile phones are vital for young people, while others argue that these technologies will cause negative social and communication effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The internet and mobile phones have become indispensable components of daily life and have revolutionized the way we communicate, stay informed and access entertainment. Those who advocate for their use feel that they are invaluable for young people due to the educational and social benefits they provide. On the other hand, there are those who feel that embracing these technologies may lead to negative social and communication effects.
The proponents of the internet and mobile phones point out that, for young people, these devices offer learning opportunities that were unavailable during previous generations. The internet provides newfound knowledge, by making information from all around the globe accessible in the comfort of one’s own home. Meanwhile, mobile phones facilitate communication and keep friends and family in touch easily and quickly, from anywhere in the world. As a result, young people are able to forge connections, open themselves to different worldviews, and can keep informed of global news.
However, there are those who raise the valid concern that these technologies can have a negative effect on social and communication skills. For example, the heavy use of these devices can lead to the disengagement with the physical world, causing a decline in physical activity, as well as limiting real-world social interaction. In addition, there is debate over whether the presence of these devices can lead to addiction, neurosis, and other negative psychological effects.
In my opinion, embracing the internet and mobile phones offers immeasurable benefits, while managing the potential risks of their usage need not be as difficult as some fear. Moderation and education in the use of these technologies are key. When used in healthy and measured doses, young people can reap the rewards of easier access to knowledge and enjoy the advantages of a connected world.